Henry IV Part 1
William Shakespeare
Free Sample Essay Download
Please enter your details below to get your free sample essay delivered straight to your inbox.
Character Analysis: Minor characters
Prince John
John of Lancaster is Hal’s little brother, and though we don’t see much of him, he is apparently a valiant fighter who impresses both Hal and Henry at Shrewsbury, and even holds his own against Hotspur in battle. However, in 15th century England, the early bird gets the worm and the first born son gets the glory, so despite being the good son who doesn’t stay out all night drinking at the tavern, John is relegated to being secondary in every sense to the primogenital prince, Hal.
Westmoreland
The Earl of Westmoreland is one of King Henry’s most loyal men. He leads the royal army and remains by the king’s side throughout much of the play. At the end, he is told to ride with Prince John to find some of the most important remaining rebels: Northumberland and the Archbishop. In some ways, Westmoreland can be seen as a mirror image of Worcester, in that he almost functions as the king’s trusted brother, and uncle to John and Hal. However, where Worcester betrays the king by abandoning him in favour of his brother Northumberland, Westmoreland is steadfast in his support, and is rewarded with even greater responsibilities after the battle.
Sir Walter Blunt
Blunt is loyal to King Henry and even fights in the kings uniform at the Battle of Shrewsbury. His function in the play is largely a messenger, and he is charged with delivering Henry’s offer of grace to the rebels, which is promptly rejected by Hotspur.
At the battle, Blunt is one of the men Henry dresses in royal clothing so as to confuse their enemies (and it works!). This process of “counterfeiting,” aside from being a cunning political tactic, is also symbolic for how even a minor character like Blunt can seem like a king in their outward appearance.
Sir Richard Vernon
Vernon is aligned with the rebels and is complicit in Worcester’s plan to withhold important information from Hotspur because both men agree that he is “too wilfulblame” and “hare-brained” to be trusted. However, this is ultimately to their detriment, and he is put to death by King Henry for his part in the rebellion. Vernon is one of the more rational politicians in the play, but he is unable to outmanoeuvre the more effective role-players like Hal and Henry.
Lady Kate Percy
Kate is Hotspur’s (presumably long-suffering) wife who, to her credit, seems to genuinely love her husband in spite of his flaws. She does her best to dote on him, but he diminishes her at every turn – she asks about the battle and he tells her she’s too much of a woman to understand; she asks him to be a loving, chivalrous knight and he explicitly tells her he doesn’t love her; she tries to playfully flirt with him but he either ignores her or just doesn’t realise what’s going on because he’s fantasising about a battle! Their relationship is plagued by an inability to communicate their desires, which is all the more ironic when juxtaposed with Mortimer and Lady Mortimer.
Some readings of the play also interpret Hotspur’s deliberate distancing from his wife as a product of his fear of emasculation. In Hotspur’s mind, emotional or sexual intimacy with Kate would jeopardise his very manly fortitude.
Either way, Kate’s underlying affections for Hotspur make her an unwitting victim of his recklessness, and his death will leave her no recourse but to grieve his loss in Part 2.
Lady Mortimer
Lady Mortimer is also very, very Welsh. She speaks no English but is consumed with love for her English husband, Mortimer, and communicates with him via her father, Glendower. She does not have any lines in the play aside from her singing, but she functions to highlight dimensions of Hotspur and Kate’s characters and relationship.
Poins
Poins is Hal’s right-hand man during his time at the tavern, and the two
conspire to deceive Falstaff after the robbery in Act 2.
Bardolph, Peto, and Gadshill
These men are all tavern reprobates who are intimated to be liars, drunks, and thieves. They represent the “base contagious clouds” that Hal uses to seemingly “smother up” his brilliance in the early scenes, and though Hal seems to have a good rapport with them, engaging in witty persiflage, he ultimately abandons them when the time comes and he takes on his more princely demeanour.
Francis
Francis is a drawer (i.e. a servant) at the tavern. He is also often played as an affable idiot – a “puny” lower-class boy who struggles to count his own age, and so is essentially an innocent. Hence, Hal’s messing about with him could be interpreted as a kind of exploitation as this wealthy, highly educated prince dangles promises of wealth in front of a poor servant just to amuse himself. But his scene is also an example of how effortlessly Hal can manipulate others into loving him.
Archbishop of York and Sir Michael
These two men are only seen briefly in Act 4 Scene 4. They are supporters of Northumberland (and will pay the price for this in Part 2!) so try to warn Hotspur about the reality of his situation – his allies have abandoned him and the king is far more powerful than they once thought now that Hal is by his side. But Hotspur doesn’t want to hear it; he completely ignores the letter that Sir Michael rushed to deliver in favour of running head-first into battle. This mostly just underscores the hot-headed intemperance of Hotspur, but also hints at how well-intentioned or respected figures now have a diminishing role in this new world of Realpolitik.
King Richard II
Though he makes no appearance in this play, having been killed in the prequel, the spectre of King Richard II metaphorically looms over King Henry in this text. Though Henry didn’t technically kill Richard, he all but instructed one of his men to do the deed, later claiming that he knew nothing of such plans. Some of the rebels give us conflicting accounts about how they viewed Richard, with Hotspur glorifying the rightful king and expressing bitterness over the circumstances of his deposition and death. But most of the focus on Richard comes from Henry, who draws repeated contrasts between himself and the “skipping king” who “ambled up and down / With shallow jesters and rash bavin wits” and “mingled his royalty with cap’ring fools,” most notably in Act 3 Scene 2 when Henry warns Hal not to take his position for granted. Richard’s death is also likely a contributing factor to Henry’s irrepressible guilt, manifesting as a desire to make a pilgrimage to Jerusalem so that he may atone for the sin of killing a king.
Download a free Sample Essay
Henry IV Part 1
Sample Essay
Henry IV Part 1 is the second in a series of four history plays. Following the events of the first play, Richard II, England is in a state of disarray as the current king, Henry IV, deposed and killed the former king, Richard II. (The background information section that follows will have more information about this play’s prequel and sequels!)
King Henry is worried because his son and heir to the throne, Prince Hal, spends his time cavorting and drinking, seemingly led astray by his best friend Falstaff who is delightfully witty but also an old, fat, dastardly liar. But Hal reveals in a soliloquy that he is merely pretending to be wayward so that he will seem all the more impressive when he takes his place by his father’s side and prepares to take the throne.
Meanwhile, some of Henry’s former friends are plotting a rebellion against him; chiefly, the Earl of Northumberland helped Henry rise to the throne, but now feels he is no longer valued. Northumberland has a son named Hotspur who is Hal’s age, but is much more respected than Hal. Hotspur is a valiant fighter with many military victories to his name. However, as we will come to see, he is also a fatally flawed character who believes in upholding honour and his own ideals at whatever cost. This blinds him to the political manoeuvring of other characters, and will ultimately lead to his death.
Despite the imminent rebellion, Hal seems content to delay his return, so he, Falstaff, and their friends at the tavern continue to banter and commit some petty theft. They then decide to have a pretend play where Falstaff acts as King Henry and Hal practises what he will say to explain his waywardness. But Falstaff acts silly, so Hal switches the roles and then he pretends to be his father. He chastises Falstaff for his corrosive influence on Hal, and derides him as a dishonourable and vile man (and the line between the pretend play and Hal’s true feelings blurs). Falstaff says that banishing him would be like banishing all the world, and Hal promises that he will indeed banish Falstaff one day. This sets in motion Hal’s ‘redemption arc.’
Hal eventually meets with his father and apologises, attesting that he will redeem himself by killing the rebel Hotspur. Soon enough, Hotspur and the other rebels rise up, though Hotspur’s dubious leadership abilities mean he loses some allies along the way, and is ostensibly unable to inspire much confidence in his forces. Nevertheless, all of the characters meet on the battlefield, including Falstaff who is just doing his best not to die. Falstaff also provides us with a meditation on the meaning of ‘honour,’ by the end of which he concludes honour is a futile, empty word that is worthless for both the living and the dead.
Tensions rise, swords clash, and the Battle of Shrewsbury commences. Henry has disguised numerous soldiers in his own king’s uniform, so there are multiple ‘counterfeit’ kings running around just to make things confusing for their enemies. Hal does indeed fulfil his promise and triumph over Hotspur in battle, saving his father’s life in the process. Henry pulls his son aside to tell him that he has redeemed himself, and earned back his father’s and his nation’s trust.
Falstaff, who survived by playing dead, then sneaks in to stab Hotspur’s corpse and then take credit for his death. Hal sees through Falstaff’s lie, but agrees to go along with it for the sake of his old friend.
The play ends with Hal graciously letting an enemy prisoner go free, foreshadowing the sequels in which he will grow into a benevolent and admired king.
I would highly recommend seeking out a video performance of the play. Shakespearean plays were meant to be performed, and as such this is one of the best ways to solidify your understanding of the text. Your teacher may show you various versions in class, such as the Hollow Crown BBC series, but in my opinion the best one is Shakespeare’s Globe performance from 2010. You can find excerpts online, but the whole recording is a fantastic rendition, and even gives you a sense of what it would have been like to attend one of these plays at the Globe Theatre in Shakespeare’s era. Most importantly, it’s funny! And we usually miss out on the humour when we just try and read the script of the play, which is a real tragedy for this text!
For the best possible experience, read through the play while watching the perfor- mance – this will bring the lines to life and make both the amusing and more poignant, emotional moments in this play much more memorable!
Get this free Sample Essay delivered straight to your email, instantly.
Free Sample Essay Download
Please enter your details below to get your free sample essay delivered straight to your inbox.